Donate Your Health Care Data Today – The New York Times

By | October 3, 2019

If you’re reading this, you’ve probably become increasingly concerned about your data, and for good reason: It seems that every day, we wake up to news about a new data breach or privacy violation, encouraging collective paranoia to travel widely and well.

This fear is perhaps most justified when it comes to matters as intimate as our health — there is something haunting about the image of an attacker with unauthorized access to our treatment records, medication protocol and comprehensive electronic health records. On the other hand, should we really be so worried that people will find out about our history of arrhythmia or the results of a recent blood test? In reality, it is not the existence of this data that’s dangerous but the intent of the agents who can obtain it and what they choose to use it for.

[If you’re online — and, well, you are — chances are someone is using your information. We’ll tell you what you can do about it. Sign up for our limited-run newsletter.]

But I think it’s time to stop and consider how we might reframe and rethink our cultural narrative around privacy, particularly the critical role health care data could play in medical innovation. Aggregated health care data has the potential to be a public good, part of a collective effort to develop new medical treatments, improve clinical outcomes across medical fields and save lives.

Our current “health care data” includes wide profiling information like family history, socioeconomic background, geography as well as our medical data — the information directly concerning treatments, procedures and medication usage. Consider the world before 1996, when Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the landmark health privacy legislation that remains intact today. Before HIPAA, doctors, nurses and pharmacies had long been permitted to give third parties what is now called “protected health information” — identifiable information related to medical history, conditions and treatment. Medical records were not digitized but written with pen or pencil, filed in paper folders and alphabetized by the hands of an office administrator.

A lot has changed, technologically speaking, since 1996 — even since 2009, when Congress passed the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which aimed to incentivize providers and patients to adopt the use of technology and electronic medical records. Thanks to improvements in data storage and computational technologies, medical advancements no longer rely simply on individual human learning processes — testing hypotheses in real time, tracking outcomes of limited data sets, developing theories based on patterns over time.

With enormous amounts of patient health data being collected and digitized each day, the other piece of the puzzle comes into focus. If aggregated, our anonymized health records could become part of a large-scale data set to improve the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses across all medical fields using machine learning algorithms. The more anonymous data we collect — demographic and medical — the better we can identify causes, diagnose early and develop better treatments. In the process, we can draw connections between previously disconnected data sets — diagnoses and geography, medication protocol and lifestyle, treatment success and medical history, and plenty more.

To do this successfully and at scale, we need data. All of our data. Mine and yours.

Machine learning was recently shown to detect early lung cancer more accurately than human radiologists. In May 2019, Google and Northwestern Medicine teamed up to apply a deep-learning algorithm to 42,290 patient CT scans to predict one’s likelihood of lung cancer. Because the images are difficult to read, Google and Northwestern’s study developed a machine-learning model to read them, then compared the results with those of six experienced radiologists. According to the study, the machine-learning model was able to detect cancer 5 percent more often than the radiologists and was 11 percent more likely to decrease false positives.

This is just one example, but it emphasizes the need for large-scale pattern recognition in creating predictive diagnostic models. The human brain can develop the deep-learning algorithms necessary for this kind of innovation, but only the algorithms can effectively recognize patterns at such a large and impactful scale.

Some may claim that the potential damage from a health care company data breach is far more complex than the damage from other forms of data warfare — and they are correct. Victims cannot simply change their passwords or cancel their credit cards to resolve the risks of identity theft, fraud, risk profiling, targeted psychographics, increased insurance premiums and other dangerous (and expensive) consequences.

Regardless, digital health care data will continue to be collected every day, providing tremendous opportunities for medical research and treatment, as well as the inevitable potential for danger that exists in all walks of digital life. Why not go ahead and put this information in the hands of the right agents, and establish strict regulation and enforcement protocols in the process?

With the support and intervention of regulatory bodies, there would need to be an extensive de-identification process to irreversibly anonymize our personal data. These bodies would also need to prohibit the monetization of health care data and prevent it from being used for profiling or any other unethical or criminal purpose. A zero-tolerance policy for foul use of our data will probably yield better results than another cybercrime consultant or better computer servers.

The vast amount of information each of us possesses is far too important to be left under the control of just a few entities — private or public. We can think of our health care data as a contribution to the public good and equalize its availability to scientists and researchers across disciplines, like open source code. From there, imagine better predictive models that will in turn allow better and earlier diagnoses, and eventually better treatments.

Your health care data could help people who are, at least in some medical aspects, very similar to you. It might even save their lives. The right thing to do with your data is not to guard it, but to share it.

Oren Frank is the chief executive of Talkspace.

Like other media companies, The Times collects data on its visitors when they read stories like this one. For more detail please see our privacy policy and our publisher’s description of The Times’s practices and continued steps to increase transparency and protections.

Follow @privacyproject on Twitter and The New York Times Opinion Section on Facebook and Instagram.

glossary replacer

"Health|HealthCare" – Google News